Comments on: The Principle of Individuation and the Problem of the Two Spheres http://quadri.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/the-principle-of-individuation-and-the-problem-of-the-two-spheres/ Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:18:01 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Josh http://quadri.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/the-principle-of-individuation-and-the-problem-of-the-two-spheres/#comment-548 Josh Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:54:22 +0000 http://quadri.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-548 Hi William, Thanks for stopping by! I agree with your statement, and I think that it seems to presuppose the existence of something like haecceities - that is - there is some property which makes Josh = Josh ('Joshness'). Hi William,

Thanks for stopping by! I agree with your statement, and I think that it seems to presuppose the existence of something like haecceities – that is – there is some property which makes Josh = Josh (‘Joshness’).

]]> By: William http://quadri.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/the-principle-of-individuation-and-the-problem-of-the-two-spheres/#comment-547 William Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:40:23 +0000 http://quadri.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-547 Excuse the repetition: my if-and-only-if connective did not display. Does not the very existence of Josh depend upon, and give rise to, Josh-ness? That is: Josh exists if, and only if, Josh = Josh. Excuse the repetition: my if-and-only-if connective did not display.

Does not the very existence of Josh depend upon, and give rise to, Josh-ness? That is: Josh exists if, and only if, Josh = Josh.

]]> By: William http://quadri.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/the-principle-of-individuation-and-the-problem-of-the-two-spheres/#comment-546 William Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:35:10 +0000 http://quadri.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-546 Does not the very existence of Josh depend upon--and give rise to--Joshness? That is: Josh exists Josh = Josh William J. Greenberg Does not the very existence of Josh depend upon–and give rise to–Joshness? That is:

Josh exists Josh = Josh

William J. Greenberg

]]>